Preliminary Study
Introduction
The geophysical strand of the DART project will be investigating the extent to which monthly seasonal variations affect the conditions ideal for the detection of archaeological residues. This is mainly dependant on the contrast between the target archaeology and the surrounding soil matrix. Past studies based on monthly surveying over archaeological features (Clark, Hesse, Cott) have shown there to be a seasonal variation associated with geophysical detection which is a function of soil geology, the weather, temperature etc. The DART project aims to continue to explore the effect of these variables on test sites with differing geologies and archaeological features.
Past studies into the effects of seasonal variation have however, led to variable results, and have not investigated the instantaneous effect of weather on the measurements, which is vital to the understanding of the accuracy of the measurements. Surprisingly perhaps, the author does not recall work looking at the effect of the immediate weather on survey success. This is key to investigate, because if the results show a large variation in survey success over the days of a month, the validity of once-monthly surveys would be drastically affected, and the dependency we have on the results collected once a month is thrown into question. The investigations will also help highlight the dynamic action of moisture variation through the soil, and how quickly (and if) periods of wet weather effect geophysical readings, and for how long.
Method
The proposed method will be to set up a test area at the University of Bradford. This will be used as a survey platform for a month. Each day of the month the test area will be surveyed with earth resistance and GPR measurements, using a twin-probe array at resolution of 0.5X0.5m. Resistivity pseudosections (or ERT) will also be conducted over the site. This will provide a dataset of approx. 30 surveys which will be analysed. It will be important to obtain local, accurate weather information on a day-to-day basis so that this data can be cross-referenced with the geophysical datasets.
Andy Parkyn has already conducted monthly seasonality tests over a test area at Bradford University and logistically it would seem sensible to continue this work, using this same test area, and his local expertise.
Expectations
Subtle variation is expected throughout the month, with occasional peaks in the datasets following conditions of adverse rainfall. It is expected that a small trend will be plotted over the duration of the month. This study will highlight a practical need for deeper understanding into the immediate impact of local weather on moisture variation over a site.
R.











Just a few ideas, comments welcome.
R.
That seems a very useful to do. I take it you have access to a met station.
Hi Bob, yes, the previous study on the area used weather information from the local weather station at Bingley I believe. I have also found some accessible data from the Leeds/Bradford Airport weather station. The weather stations arn’t as close to the site as the monthly surveys will be, but should hopefully show general variations with general daily weather events. Thanks for your comment. Rob.
Given local variability in rainfall patterns etc. I feel you probably need a much more local met station to provide truly relevant readings. Failing that I suspose you could watch the rainfall radar on the met office site to make sure you are not getting a very different pattern from your met station.
A question borne of ignorance, but is soil temperature an issue?
Hi Dave,
These issues are true, as Laura pointed out at the steer meeting in January, the rainfall can be different over such a small locallity. To try and counteract this, Chris Gaffney has managed to get his hands on some rain-guages which will be deployed around the survey area over the month. These will be averaged to give a relativly accurate result of rainfall over the survey area each day of the month.
As for temperature, this is indeed a factor, and one which will be monitered over the 15 months of survey for the main test sites. However, as this investigation is just a side investigation on the geophysical variability of day-to-day readings, and has to be conducted on no budget, the temperature readings are, in my view, not essential to this study.
The main aim of this study is to see if the data changes day-to-day, and by how much – to validate our monthy surveying plans. The issue of why can be further investigated in much more detail when the main test sites are running. – These will take these measurements every hour for the full 15 month period.
Thanks for the comment, Rob.